Author Topic: BayCruiser in Watercraft magazine  (Read 12868 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Julian Swindell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
BayCruiser in Watercraft magazine
« on: 14 Dec 2009, 21:31 »
I have just been poring over Tony's review of BayCruiser no2 in the Jan/Feb issue of Watercraft. I have been examining the photos with a magifying glass to spot the differences between no1 and no2. The mailsail is the most obvious, a fully batten main on no2 as opposed to my single battened full-roach. I wonder what the differences are in handling? What I would recommend to any future buyer is to get the hardwood rubbing strake, even though it adds to the price. I have just been repairing a dinge in mine, where I clobbered a pontoon. Without it I would have been repairing a hole in the hull.
Tony is right in noting that the water ballast gives huge stability. I have never felt at risk of being knocked over, even in F7 plus. I only reef to reduce weather helm, not because it is getting hairy, and then she goes even faster. If the new raked rudder blade Matt has fitted gets rid of the weather helm then I will probably rarely reef at all. Role on the summer, lets hope its a good one at last.
Julian Swindell
BayCruiser 20 Daisy Grace
http://jegsboat.wordpress.com/
Guillemot building blog
https://jegsguillemot.wordpress.com/

Tony

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 656
Re: BayCruiser in Watercraft magazine
« Reply #1 on: 15 Dec 2009, 20:26 »
Hi, Julian.
You have a good boat there, alright. Much more able on the water than the CBL,just as easy to launch and recover (easier, in fact, with the more buoyant transom stern) and not much more difficult to live with on the road. I wonder if the new 23 footer is going to be as suitable for long distance towing? Perhaps it would be more problematic in a Hotel car park!
I dont know if the fully battened sail gives more drive - have to ask Matt - but it certainly seemed very easy to handle and felt well  matched to the hull. Plenty of power available.
As for the possibility of a good summer....why dont you do what I do. Hitch up and tow to the sun. Swallow Boats could have been built for the Ionian. (In fact, mine was!)

Seriously. Take a ferry to St Malo and you are in Brittany that afternoon and South of France the next day.
Three days easy driving from Calais gets you to Ancona in Italy. (NB Italian motorway cafe food can be superb.)
An overnight ferry from there gets you to Greece or Croatia early next morning.
I havent visited Spain or the Baltic yet but there is always next year.
That BayCruiser of yours would eat it up. A shame not to use her to her full potential if you have the time available. Why not stock up on Factor 50 and go for it?

Julian Swindell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
Re: BayCruiser in Watercraft magazine
« Reply #2 on: 16 Dec 2009, 08:55 »
I would love to but to echo Matt's lament on another thread-
I wish I were retired...
Julian Swindell
BayCruiser 20 Daisy Grace
http://jegsboat.wordpress.com/
Guillemot building blog
https://jegsguillemot.wordpress.com/

Jonathan Stuart

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
Re: BayCruiser in Watercraft magazine
« Reply #3 on: 26 Jul 2010, 14:22 »
Hi,

This article is available online if anyone hasn't got a copy of the magazine:

http://www.exacteditions.com/exact/browse/603/1075/6796/2/13/0/

Makes good reading!

Jonathan.
Jonathan

Ex - BayCruiser 26 #11 "Bagpuss"
Ex - BayRaider Expedition #3 "Mallory"